NOVAKERNSeries A
1 / 13
Series A · Germany · 2026

Functional proteins,
brewed not extracted.

High-value proteins and specialty enzymes made by precision fermentation, and the production platform that makes them, licensed to manufacturers.

Raising
€5.5M
Pre-money
€22.5M
Revenue 2032
€118.6M
Break-even
2029
Reference project. NOVAKERN is a fictional company. The name, the branding and every figure in this deck have been changed, and the underlying dataset is synthetic. The work, the structure and the methodology are real.
The problem

A $420B industry still sourced by extraction.

Industrial buyers of functional proteins depend on animal extraction or crop processing. Both are set by biology and weather rather than by process control.

$420B
Sourced the old way

Specialty ingredients still depend on extraction, where yield and purity are dictated by the source.

±40%
Price volatility

Buyers absorb double-digit annual swings driven by drought, herd size and export policy.

Lot-to-lot
Specification drifts

Formulators compensate with wider tolerances, pushing cost into every downstream product.

Scarce
The best actives are hardest

The highest-value proteins are exactly the ones hardest to obtain at consistent quality and scale.

Why now

Animal-free moved from claim to requirement.

Procurement
Mandates, not marketing

Animal-free sourcing is now a procurement requirement across European food, cosmetics and personal care. Buyers need a qualified, documented, non-extractive supply, and very few exist at industrial specification.

Demand
Premium beauty wants functional actives

Skincare is the value centre of a beauty market heading past $680B by 2030. Cosmetic-grade ingredients clear a shorter approval path than food, which makes them the fastest first route to revenue.

Gap
Plant alternatives added a category, not a spec

Plant-derived substitutes created a category but did not solve specification. They cannot reproduce the exact protein structures formulators specify. Precision fermentation targets the molecule itself.

Economics
Continuous production changes the maths

Running at steady state rather than in batches is what moves unit cost from premium niche toward commodity-adjacent, and what turns the process into something worth licensing.

The business

One platform, two revenue engines.

We sell the product now and license the process later. The second engine overtakes the first in 2028 and carries the business through break-even.

Engine A · today

Functional proteins and specialty enzymes

Sold by the kilogram on multi-year supply agreements to European manufacturers in food processing, cosmetics and technical formulation. Cosmetic actives are the beachhead: smallest volumes, highest price per kilogram, fastest qualification.

2026 €0.0M → 2032 €16.2M
Engine B · from 2027

The platform, licensed

Strain and process licensing plus fermentation systems, sold to manufacturers who would rather adopt the process than rebuild it. Higher margin, and it scales without us building every plant.

2027 €0.5M → 2032 €102.4M
Defensibility

The cost curve is the moat.

Peers can express the same proteins. Almost all of them do it in batch campaigns, which caps throughput per litre and holds capital per kilogram high.

Process
Continuous, not batch

Months at steady state rather than discrete campaigns. Higher throughput per litre installed, far lower capital per kilogram.

Know-how
Proprietary strain library

Expression strains tuned per target protein, held as trade secret. Yield improves every campaign, and that run history cannot be copied from a patent.

IP
Patent-pending process families

Continuous-production and downstream-purification families filed via PCT. Filings cover the process; the strain library stays secret.

Route
Cosmetics-first go-to-market

A shorter qualification cycle funds the company while food-enzyme dossiers work through the longer EU route in parallel.

Market

A narrow wedge into a very large market.

TAM$420B
SAM$38B
Wedge$1.8B

TAM: global specialty ingredients across food, cosmetics and technical formulation. SAM: the share addressable by fermentation-derived proteins and enzymes. Wedge: the premium cosmetic actives beachhead. Bars are scaled for legibility, not linearly. Our own 2032 plan is roughly €119M of revenue, a fraction of the wedge alone.

Cosmetic functional proteins

Beachhead segment. Revenue potential €62M.

Food processing enzymes

Follows food-grade certification. Revenue potential €48M.

Technical formulation

Volume tier under REACH bands. Revenue potential €41M.

Competition

We compete on process, not on molecule.

PlayerCategoryStageWhere they stop
Ferrolux BioPrecision fermentationSeries BBroad enzyme catalogue, weaker purity spec at high volume
ProteviaPrecision fermentationSeries ACosmetics-first, no food-grade certification yet
Kaskade BioworksPlatform / CDMOSeries CContract manufacturing at scale, does not own end products
Halvard BioPlant extractionEstablishedAnimal-free, but cannot hit the exact specified structures
NOVAKERNContinuous platformSeries AContinuous process plus a licensable second engine

Competitor names above are invented for this reference version.

Roadmap

From pilot line to platform business.

2023–24Strain library established, process IP filed via PCT
2025500 L pilot running continuously, purity held to spec across the run
2026Round A close and first commercial revenue
2027First platform licence signed, food-grade certification for first product
2028Platform engine overtakes product revenue, Round B €15M
2029EBITDA and net profit turn positive
2030Round C €30M, multi-site platform rollout
2032~€119M revenue, the large majority from the licensed platform
The model

€118.6M revenue by 2032, break-even in 2029.

Product Platform Grants / milestone €M · 2026–2032
Revenue 2032
€118.6M
EBITDA 2032
€89.7M
Break-even
2029
Customers 2032
166
Team 2032
45 FTE
Unit economics

Cost per kilogram is the whole thesis.

Continuous operation is what carries unit cost from pilot economics to the level where large manufacturers switch, and where licensing the process becomes more valuable than selling the output.

Today
€180
per kg at pilot scale

500 L continuous line. Viable for premium cosmetic actives, too high for volume food applications.

At scale
<€60
per kg industrial

The point where food-processing and technical grades open up, and where licensees see a clear build-versus-adopt case.

Result
2028
engines cross over

Platform revenue passes product revenue and becomes the dominant engine, at materially higher margin.

Scenario drivers modelled: platform licence value, yield per litre, new customers per year, COGS percentage, and scale-up delay. Base, upside and downside cases recompute the full chain through to cash.

Team

Built by people who have scaled fermentation before.

AR
Dr. Annika Reuter
Chief Executive

Twelve years in bioprocess development and commercial scale-up at a large European fermentation group.

MH
Dr. Milan Hofer
Chief Technology

PhD in synthetic biology. Built the strain engineering and expression platform, and owns the process IP.

SL
Sara Lindqvist
Chief Operating

Led downstream processing and quality operations across two industrial fermentation sites.

JW
Jonas Weiss
Head of Commercial

Ingredient sales into European food-processing and cosmetics accounts.

12 FTE at Round A, 45 by 2032. Every person named here is invented for this reference version.

The raise

€5.5M at €22.5M pre-money.

Use of funds
Operations and team runway35%
Fermentation and process scale-up19%
Food-grade facility and quality systems15%
Strain library and specialty R&D15%
Strategic customer programs9%
Regulatory and IP7%
Cap table after the round
HolderPrePost
Founders62.0%49.8%
Existing investors18.0%14.5%
Angels / pre-seed12.0%9.6%
ESOP8.0%6.4%
Series A investors19.6%

€28.0M post-money. Round B €15M in 2028 and Round C €30M in 2030 are modelled, both against a business that is already cash-generative from 2029.

The ask

€5.5M to reach the cost curve.

The pilot line runs. The cosmetics beachhead qualifies fastest. Round A funds the 2,000 L line, the strain library and the commercial team, and takes us to the first platform licence.

Reference project. NOVAKERN is fictional. Name, branding and all figures changed; dataset synthetic. The work is real.